Friday, June 27, 2008

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Redux

Road Fear Factor: Just how good is a BCS conference vs NCM schools. (Note that from this point on the role of Non BCS will be played by Non Charter Member since all Div IA schools officially belong to the BCS) We have been subjected to the constant mantra of BCS superiority without any real substance. The rhetoric waxes thin when looking at things from ground level. Question: Why do Vegas sportsliners spot the home team 3 points on the spread? Answer: Because of home field advantage. Is this a real phenomenon, or just window dressing?

There are so many factors to playing on the road, that even without a crowd; the home field presents a challenge to the visitors. Home is where you want to be when playing a football game. That fact has long escaped BCS pundits when dressing up their charts, stats, and quips concerning the so called power conferences, or has it?

This weeks Fear Factor will focus on the ACC. They are a new and more powerful conference since they have taken the best of the Big East with them. They are getting allot of love right now, and it would be interesting to see just how strong their Road Fear Factor is. The RFF is a chart showing the record and winning percentage on the road by BCS teams vs NCM schools since 1985. Why 1985? Because BYU won the national championship in 1984 and that is when this whole BCS mess actually got started.

Can a team who never travels to NCM schools to play really consider themselves superior as a team? Sure they can claim economic superiority due to their ability to fix more home games, but it doesn't say a whole lot about their teams ability to win when the deck is stacked in someone else’s hand.



Note: RL= Road Loss RW= Road Win NCM R%= Percentage of Road Games played at NCM schools. NCM RW%= Number of Road Games won at NCM Schools. NCM W%= Number of games won vs NCM Schools. Also this is based on regular season games. Bowl games are not calculated, and also any games ending in a tie were not considered.

ACC

W

L

H

RL

RW

Tot

NCM R%

NCM RW%

NCM W%

Clemson

25

1

26

0

0

26

0.000

0.000

0.962

North Carolina State

30

9

32

2

1

39

0.077

0.143

0.769

Duke

23

8

22

5

4

31

0.290

0.444

0.742

Maryland

17

3

16

2

2

20

0.200

0.500

0.850

Wake Forest

34

12

29

7

10

46

0.370

0.588

0.739

Virginia Tech

47

13

42

7

11

60

0.300

0.611

0.783

Boston College

34

12

24

8

14

46

0.478

0.636

0.739

Georgia Tech

22

2

21

1

2

24

0.125

0.667

0.917

Virginia

27

6

27

2

4

33

0.182

0.667

0.818

Florida State

40

2

32

2

8

42

0.238

0.800

0.952

Miami FL

48

3

36

2

13

51

0.294

0.867

0.941

North Carolina

30

7

27

1

9

37

0.270

0.900

0.811

Total

377

78

334

39

78

455

0.235

0.569

0.835


Clemson is impressive in only losing to one NCM team in twenty years. Of course they have over that period not traveled once to an NCM school. If you were to travel once a year that would at least mean 20 road games. Only Boston College and maybe Virginia Tech and Wake Forest can claim that they risk travel. What the chart does not reveal is who the most popular opponents over that time span were for the entire conference. Are you ready for this impressive top ten list of NCM and other opponents? Here it is: Army, Navy, VMI, Appalachian State, Furman, Western Carolina, East Carolina, Citadel, Tulane, and Boston U. What is scary is that some of the losses suffered were at the hands of these teams.

Makes you go hmmmmm when considering what their records might have been like had they spent more time filling in their Div IAA, Div II schedules with
Div IA teams out west. I mean a cross town, or three hour drive isn't much of a road trip now is it? North Carolina never left the state living off of Western and East Carolina until they decided to risk one trip to the Rocky Mountains. Result? A good old fashion spanking at the hands of the Utah Utes.

To be honest, if your road schedule vs NCM schools isn't at least 35% or higher, as a program you have no credibility in calling yourself superior. Winning on the road is hard, and I understand the strategic economic need of salting the schedule with winnable home games. But marketing your program as superior through association with the BCS? It only makes losses like
North Carolinas last year all that more painful. The smart strategist would be looking to enhance the level of the opponent. Miami used to travel regularly, but they have scaled down road trips vs NCM teams in recent years. Their record over the first ten years charted was quite impressive. Therefore, victories are considered even greater, and losses not as tough to take. Congratulations to Boston College and Wake Forest for daring to test your mettle. Sure you have paid the price, but you have more credibility than your peers.




Wednesday, December 21, 2005

M.A.S.H on Call (Big East vs. MWC)

Well ten days ago I lit a fire under a fairly high traffic conference message
board by posting a little Ross Report redux. The amazing thing is that it ended
up creating a battle royale between fans from two conferences on the cusp
of the BCS. One on the inside edge and one on the outside edge.

Not only did the post thread spool rapidly before my eyes, but frayed ends
found themselves quickly intertwined with other threads which have now
knotted themselves in page after page of unsupported misinformed rants,
not so subtle insults, and outright rage.

The entire cast of characters was present:

The self appointed pseudo intellectual was first to arrive to clarify to all
would be readers that my post lacked any validity, credibility and in later
posts, I was revealed by this bastion of wisdom to be nothing more than
a ego hungry charlatan. He held no punches when he critiqued my
writing and further exposed my love affair with Roget.

The well meaning would be warrior was there fighting my battle as he
saw it. Of course this young (his expressions painted him as such) fighter
lacked the pondus of automotonical emotionality posessed by the
pi(short for pseudo intellectual), and in his heated state fought on grounds
that carried him truly away from the initial point of my post.

Other characters joined in the fray including the regular supporting cast
of pro and con artists looking to score a few points for their respective sides
to an argument that I never even broached, but somehow had initiated.

A few posts into the life of the thread, and the real opponants began to
arrive. These were inside the edge fans looking to defend their maligned
conference on the enemies “turf”. Their missiles fell harmlessly in
no-mans land where this argument quickly found itself.

More and more began to pile on with various adaptations of the standard
fighting tactics used in most conference a' conference verbal battles.
Stats were fired left and right to motivate everything from
superiority, butts in seats to athletic directors paychecks. When that failed
to dent either side, weapons were exchange and political salvos began to fly.

Scenarios that would make John Grisham proud grew out of thin air as
claims of poll rigging, payoffs and extortion were aimed at those whose
launchers will filled with grenades of bad tv market, poor ticket sales, and
unadept administrator schrapnel.

When all else failed, last ditch efforts of emotionally charged arguments
of “we're better than you” combined with personal attacks on the posters
character were used like bayonnets on the end of an M16 with an empty
banana clip.

The BCS most certainly has created a charge, and this experience is stark
evidence that for college football fans, there is no room for standoff-ish
Swiss diplomacy, here there is only FOR or AGAINST.

On Friday I will make my way into this knotted ball of craziness that
pitted Big East fans against those of the Mountain West. In an effort to
help many of these embattled football veterans to make sense of it all.
Stay tuned...

Ross Out-->

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Conference PPR Week 13

Some shifting going on as we wind down this 2005 season. Texas and USC have done much to boost their conference strength while the WAC suffers from New Mexico State, Idaho and Utah State. The MWC has due to parity moved passed the Big East which has become top heavy and bottom weak.

Rank Conference Perf Power Prev Week
1 PAC 10 53.938 47.063
2 BIG XII 52.537 48.278
3 BIG TEN 40.503 42.260
4 SEC 40.316 38.253
5 ACC 38.843 42.420
6 MWC 30.894 30.110
7 BIG EAST 23.663 30.545
8 CUSA 15.356 17.108
9 SUNBELT 6.313 4.936
10 MAC 3.501 4.263
11 IND -47.635 -23.175
12 WAC -51.173 -15.057

Power Performance Rankings Week 13

Yes, we missed week 12..and yes we are truly sorry about that. Other things took priority. Well it is week 13 and we are back. Much remains as is expected, but there are a few surprises that deviate considerably from the established red carpet Beauty Contest Stars list.

Rank Conference Team W L PPR
1 PAC 10 USC 11 0 248.850
2 BIG XII Texas 11 0 246.382
3 SEC LSU 10 1 124.117
4 ACC Virginia Tech 10 1 121.193
5 MWC TCU 10 1 117.742
6 SEC Alabama 9 2 107.651
7 PAC 10 UCLA 9 1 98.626
8 PAC 10 Oregon 10 1 97.516
9 BIG TEN Penn State 10 1 92.844
10 ACC Miami 9 2 92.633
11 BIG EAST West Virginia 9 1 88.180
12 BIG TEN Ohio State 9 2 84.368
13 SEC Georgia 9 2 80.815
14 IND Notre Dame 9 2 80.251
15 SEC Auburn 9 2 76.350
16 BIG TEN Wisconsin 9 3 73.959
17 BIG XII Texas Tech 9 2 71.261
18 ACC Boston College 8 3 69.350
19 BIG TEN Michigan 7 4 66.863
20 BIG XII Colorado 7 4 62.622
21 BIG EAST Louisville 8 2 61.986
22 WAC Boise State 9 3 61.353
23 CUSA UCF 8 3 61.265
24 WAC Fresno State 8 3 61.177
25 MAC Toledo 8 3 56.404
26 SEC Florida 8 3 55.120
27 BIG TEN Northwestern 7 4 55.111
28 BIG TEN Iowa 7 4 54.994
29 ACC Clemson 7 4 54.005
30 WAC Nevada 8 3 53.849
31 PAC 10 California 7 4 53.638
32 CUSA UTEP 8 3 53.195
33 BIG TEN Minnesota 7 4 53.107
34 ACC Georgia Tech 7 4 52.917
35 BIG XII Oklahoma 7 4 51.740
36 SEC South Carolina 7 4 48.465
37 MAC Miami-Ohio 7 4 47.760
38 BIG EAST South Florida 6 4 47.534
39 CUSA Tulsa 7 4 46.574
40 MAC Western Michigan 7 4 45.617
41 BIG XII Iowa State 7 4 45.564
42 ACC Florida State 7 4 45.524
43 MAC Northern Illinois 7 4 45.343
44 BIG XII Nebraska 7 4 43.969
45 BIG EAST Rutgers 7 4 43.716
46 MWC New Mexico 6 5 38.968
47 MAC Bowling Green 6 5 38.307
48 MWC BYU 6 5 37.701
49 WAC Louisiana Tech 6 4 37.650
50 PAC 10 Arizona State 6 5 36.457
51 MAC Central Michigan 6 5 36.226
52 MWC Colorado State 6 5 36.191
53 IND Navy 6 4 35.289
54 CUSA Southern Miss 6 5 35.096
55 SUNBELT Louisiana-Lafayette 6 5 33.245
56 MWC Utah 6 5 33.134
57 ACC North Carolina State 6 5 32.614
58 BIG EAST Pittsburgh 5 6 32.063
59 BIG XII Missouri 6 5 31.786
60 CUSA Memphis 6 5 31.247
61 ACC Virginia 6 5 30.852
62 SUNBELT Arkansas State 6 5 29.862
63 MAC Akron 6 5 29.509
64 ACC Maryland 5 6 28.788
65 PAC 10 Stanford 5 6 27.516
66 BIG TEN Michigan State 5 6 26.361
67 BIG EAST Connecticut 5 5 26.328
68 BIG XII Kansas 6 5 25.595
69 MWC San Diego State 5 6 24.426
70 CUSA Houston 5 6 24.398
71 ACC North Carolina 5 6 23.867
72 SEC Tennessee 5 6 23.648
73 CUSA SMU 5 6 23.324
74 CUSA East Carolina 5 6 23.028
75 PAC 10 Oregon State 5 6 22.914
76 CUSA UAB 5 6 22.762
77 SEC Vanderbilt 5 6 22.199
78 BIG TEN Purdue 5 6 22.110
79 WAC Hawaii 4 7 20.514
80 BIG XII Texas A&M 5 6 19.302
81 SUNBELT Middle Tenn 4 6 18.938
82 BIG XII Kansas State 5 6 17.346
83 IND Army 4 6 17.334
84 MWC Wyoming 4 7 15.277
85 SUNBELT Florida International 4 6 13.785
86 SUNBELT Louisiana-Monroe 5 6 13.414
87 MAC Ball State 4 7 11.415
88 ACC Wake Forest 4 7 10.903
89 BIG XII Baylor 5 6 10.128
90 MWC Air Force 4 7 9.362
91 CUSA Marshall 4 7 8.167
92 SEC Arkansas 4 7 7.405
93 SUNBELT Troy State 4 7 7.364
94 MAC Eastern Michigan 4 7 4.950
95 BIG XII Oklahoma State 4 7 4.755
96 MAC Ohio 4 7 3.502
97 BIG TEN Indiana 4 7 2.739
98 PAC 10 Washington State 4 7 2.012
99 BIG EAST Cincinnati 4 7 0.600
100 SEC Mississippi 3 8 -5.725
101 SEC Kentucky 3 8 -6.148
102 WAC Utah State 3 8 -10.175
103 PAC 10 Arizona 3 8 -19.469
104 SUNBELT North Texas 2 9 -25.090
105 PAC 10 Washington 2 9 -28.676
106 MWC UNLV 2 9 -34.759
107 WAC Idaho 2 9 -38.987
108 SUNBELT Florida Atlantic 2 9 -41.014
109 WAC San Jose State 3 8 -48.292
110 SEC Mississippi State 3 8 -50.103
111 CUSA Tulane 2 9 -63.730
112 CUSA Rice 1 10 -81.052
113 BIG TEN Illinois 2 9 -86.919
114 ACC Duke 1 10 -96.535
115 BIG EAST Syracuse 1 10 -111.103
116 MAC Kent State 1 10 -132.875
117 MAC Buffalo 1 10 -144.146
118 IND Temple 0 11 -323.416
119 WAC New Mexico State 0 12 -597.644

Friday, November 18, 2005

WEEK 12 Picks

With the season closing out and teams jockeying for bowl positions, many remaining games have big significance. Some are betting their BCS bowl hopes on the outcomes, while others are hoping for a chance at post season play, even if it is in the (Pick your sponsor) drizzling rain, yawn, is there something more interesting Bowl. Rivals go at it this week, and anything can happen. This may end up being one of my worst weeks, but hey it is all good, even if my reputation for picking is wrung out to dry.

Three upsets are on the docket this week. Well statistically they are upsets, IMO they are anomalies of the college football landscape.

TEXAS TECH at OKLAHOMA


Red Raiders have over the past month gone from Contender to Pretender, and last weeks game vs Oklahoma State only revealed vulnerabilities on the offensive line as well how fragile the skewed balance between running and throwing the ball really is. The Cowboys shut Techs running game down, and made the Redraiders even more one dimensional. As funny as this may sound, the solution to beating Texas Tech is forcing them to throw the ball (as if they needed encouragement to do so.) Oklahoma has been coming into their own over the course of the past month. Stringing together four conference wins in a row. Oklahoma should be up to the task having the ninth ranked rushing defense in the nation. Sooners continue to improve while Texas Tech takes a backseat in the Big XII while falling into that "getting votes" category.


ARKANSAS STATE at ARMY

To be honest does anyone sans those with ties to the USArmy really care about this game? Well having served in the Army myself, I have to admit that I really don't care about this game. It is just really hard to get up for a game between a Div IA imposter and a service academy that has stunk it up for almost a decade. Well the consolation is that at least the game will be held at West Point where the crowd will be twice the size of anything Arkansas State could possibly drum up. In any case, the statistics show the Indians winning this one, but I have to wonder just how savvy this team is vs Div IA outside the Sunbelt, even a lowly Black Knights team. While it won't be a pretty game, Arkansas State will find themselves wondering if anyone in their conference can win 6 games for that all important New Orleans Bowl. Black Knights of Army make it 4 W's in a row.


CLEMSON vs SOUTH CAROLINA

This game statistically sees the Clemson Tigers winning. This team has had allot of close calls this season, losing OT games vs Miami and BC. South Carolina started slowly, but has put together consistantly better looking victories over SEC opponants, and comes into this game riding a five game winning streak. This game is not in Death Valley, but the crowd will be just as loud as Gamecock fans will be out in mass numbers cheering on Spurrier's kids. This one is going to go back and forth with some ugly behavior as there is no love lost between these two teams for Dixie Dominance. South Carolina scratch and peck out a win in Columbia.

The rest of my picks for this week:

Last week 32-17 (.646) Season 236-116 (.670)

Teams in blue are picked to win. Teams in red are picked to win as upsets. Teams in green are picked to win even though match is picked as even.


ACC
Virginia Tech <-- Virginia
Boston College <-- Maryland
Middle Tennessee --> North Carolina State
Duke --> North Carolina
Clemson --> South Carolina
Georgia Tech --> Miami




Big East
Cincinnati --> South Florida
Syracuse --> Notre Dame




Big Ten
Northwestern <-- Illinois
Minnesota <-- Iowa
Purdue <-- Indiana
Ohio State <-- Michigan
Penn State <-- Michigan State




Big XII
Texas Tech --> Oklahoma
Oklahoma State EVEN Baylor
Missouri <-- Kansas State




C-USA
UCF <-- Rice
East Carolina EVEN Marshall
SMU --> Houston
UAB EVEN UTEP
Tulsa <-- Tulane
Memphis --> Southern Miss




MAC
Central Michigan <-- Ball State
Eastern Michigan <-- Buffalo
Miami-OH <-- Ohio




MWC
Air Force EVEN New Mexico
Utah EVEN BYU
Colorado State <-- UNLV
Wyoming EVEN San Diego State




PAC10
Washington State <-- Washington
Oregon State --> Oregon
California <-- Stanford
Fresno State --> USC




SEC
Kentucky --> Georgia
Vanderbilt EVEN Tennessee
Mississippi State --> Arkansas
Alabama EVEN Auburn
Clemson --> South Carolina
LSU <-- Mississippi




Sun Belt
Middle Tennessee --> North Carolina State
Arkansas State --> Army
W. Kentucky <-- FIU
La Monroe <-- North Texas




WAC
Idaho <-- Boise State
Nevada <-- Utah State
New Mexico State --> San Jose State
Fresno State --> USC

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Conference PPR Week 11

Rank Conference Perf Power Prev Week
1 BIG XII 48.278 47.101
2 PAC 10 47.063 42.668
3 ACC 42.420 42.665
4 BIG TEN 42.260 44.209
5 SEC 38.253 36.209
6 BIG EAST 30.545 32.419
7 MWC 30.110 28.483
8 CUSA 17.108 16.163
9 SUNBELT 4.936 2.001
10 MAC 4.263 2.092
11 WAC -15.057 -8.192
12 IND -23.175 -23.906